On October 26, 2024, the Loma Linda University School of Religion hosted a lecture titled “Narrative, Doctrine, and Practice: Reflections on Adventist Identity in History and Theology.” The keynote speaker, Dr. David Trim, PhD, F.R. Hist.S., Director of Archives, Statistics, and Research for the General Conference, drew from his paper originally presented at the “Being the Remnant: Activist Identity in History and Theology” conference held at Andrews University two years prior. This paper, titled “Narrative, Doctrine, and Practice: Reflections on Adventist Identity in History and Theology,” was written to encapsulate the core themes of that conference.
In his lecture, Trim frequently quoted from the original conference papers while also summarizing major arguments. He synthesized insights from over 30 academic works into a unified narrative, offering analytical depth and thought-provoking reflections on the evolving identity of Adventism.
Trim opened by examining the historical and theological markers by which Adventists have defined themselves. He emphasized Adventism’s core commitments—such as adherence to the law of God and a deep-seated mission orientation—while highlighting how geographic and historical contexts have shaped the practical application of these beliefs. Trim posed the question, “What does it mean to be the remnant?” inviting the audience to consider the multifaceted nature of this identity.
One of Trim’s key points was the concept of “multiple Adventisms.” He argued that while certain practices, like Sabbath observance, have remained constant, their expressions are often culturally contingent. This contextual flexibility, he suggested, enhances rather than dilutes Adventist identity.
Trim also explored the centrality of narrative in constructing Adventist identity, positing storytelling as essential to building a shared worldview. He quoted Ante Jerončić, stating, “human identities are always narrative identities,” framing the Adventist identity not merely as a set of beliefs but as a communal journey shaped by shared experiences and stories. The Adventist narrative, conveyed through church publications, Ellen G. White’s writings, visual art, and mission stories, fosters a communal ethos.
The lecture further examined the Adventist worldview as both an articulated system of philosophy and an implicit attitude toward life. Trim highlighted the communal nature of identity, cautioning against a focus on distinctions that may inadvertently obscure the faith’s foundational tenets. He argued for the importance of constants, particularly the “Great Controversy” theme, which he characterized as indispensable to Adventist doctrine. This metanarrative, Trim emphasized, provides coherence across Adventist beliefs. As Richard Davidson articulated, Adventist theology is “Christ-centered, with Christ as the chain upon which the jewels of doctrine are linked.” This Christ-centered emphasis, according to Trim, is essential to the denomination’s doctrinal integrity.
Trim also examined lifestyle, education, and the influential role of Ellen G. White as additional tenets of Adventist identity, asserting that the ongoing question “Who are we as Adventists?” must balance historical fidelity with adaptability to contemporary contexts. His lecture encouraged a nuanced understanding of Adventist distinctiveness—rooted in Christ and community rather than rigid definitions. He argued, “History and theology need to be balanced to fully grasp and defend Adventist identity,” underscoring the dynamic equilibrium of Adventism as a faith that cherishes heritage while remaining open to change.
The dialogue was further enriched by responses from David R. Larson, DMin, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Religion at Loma Linda University, and Sigve Tonstad, MD, PhD, a theologian, and physician. Larson emphasized a triadic understanding of identity, composed of shared narrative, shared doctrine, and shared practice. He underscored the importance of community and the Great Controversy as a central metanarrative, and he highlighted the Adventist doctrine of the “whole person,” advocating against dualism and affirming holistic care as integral to Adventist identity. Larson concluded by presenting statistics reflecting the denomination’s commitment to education, healthcare, and social services—practical expressions of whole-person doctrine.
Tonstad’s response, while affirming the value of narrative in identity formation, critiqued the conference’s primary focus on 19th-century Adventist history. He noted the omission of critical 20th-century events, such as the Holocaust, arguing that such exclusions limit Adventism’s capacity to engage with broader historical and moral questions. Tonstad also proposed that, while Christ-centered, the focus of Adventist doctrine should ultimately point toward God as the focal point of Scripture. He noted the limitations of Adventist doctrines shaped primarily by Protestant frameworks, suggesting the need for a broader theological lens informed by contemporary biblical scholarship. He further presented the Sabbath not merely as a commandment but as a divine commitment, underscoring its role in promoting human well-being. Tonstad also called for deeper engagement with modern issues, such as gender and sexuality, advocating for more comprehensive and compassionate theological approaches.
The evening concluded with a Q&A session, allowing the audience to explore these themes further with the presenters. As Trim noted, the conference papers have entered peer review and are slated for publication by Andrews University Press, extending the impact of these reflections. The School of Religion extends heartfelt gratitude to Trim, Larson, and Tonstad for their clarity, thoughtfulness, and dedication in addressing this critical conversation on Adventist identity.
Article by: Ezrica Bennett
To view a recording of the program, click here.